It seems to me that this question about which is better, minarchism or anarchism, has value in philosophical discussions which may have some relevance to the real world but as long as the decision about how to organize the pocket of civilization (one of many societies making up the whole of civilization) is voluntary whose business is it besides those who have the right and responsibility to make that choice? If minarchism is voluntarily chosen for a certain pocket of civilization the anarchists need to stay within the bounds of decency and humbly accept that choice. Of course individuals who want to discuss the merits and demerits can still do so as long as they aren't deliberately trying to undermine the choice that has been made, otherwise the anarchist is a hypocrite. The same holds true for the minarchists; respecting the choice made by anarchists for their pocket of civilization.
For more information go to my website.
Go here to read about Mastery of ETHICAL ECONOMICS.
{I am currently taking a partial hiatus from blogging so frequently since I am preparing to write the fourth and final book in the divine economy theory series, due to be published around May 2011.}
No comments:
Post a Comment